The Rosewood I & II North & South Tower

The Rosewood I & II North & South Tower

Architect
Burka Architects Inc.
Developer
Greenpark
Landscape Architect
Strybos Barron King Ltd.
General Contractor
Greenpark
About the Project

The Rosewood project is a traditional "towers in the park" concept due to its natural location, open vistas and relative detachment from its neighbourhood. This seperation by green is the fundamental attraction of this site as it promotes the advantages of both urban and suburban living. The project intends to bridge the conflict between the desire to participate in city life while being detached from it at will. The site, amenity and dwelling unit layouts tend to reinforce this lifestyle. Client: Greenpark Site area: 14973 m2 GFA (gross floor area): 37700 m2 FSI (floor space index): 2.51 Number of storeys: 21 & 25 Number of units: 359

Javascript is required to view this map.

Comments

I stayed in this hotel in Moscow in 1976. It was called Hotel Moskva. I still remember how it had no bath plug. Huge horrible place. Desperate people, those old women on each floor screaming at you.
There's also the Ukraina in Moscow. Did they tear it down? Probably built to commemorate (sp?) the Famine, they may have torn it down. And rebuilt it here! How lovely.
So no change there then.

Nicely stated!

Beautiful building. I love it!

These twin disasters would get rejected in Gotham City's Shelbyville.

Ha! "Relative detachment from the neighbourhood" is used to justify the design failure.

. . . . . from anything interesting?, from vision?, from the 21st century?

Read the 'about the project' blurb above. Complete garbage and I need to know who wrote it so that I can throw something at them.

All these buildings north of Eglinton look exactly the same. Is there only one Architect up there?

They actually advertise that it is a Tower In The Park and how it is detached from its neighbourhood. Who wrote that Le Corbusier? Nothing like that is desirable nowadays especially not in that up and coming location.

isn't a blueprint usually required before construction is started?

paint it

Disclaimer: The Pug Awards makes every effort to obtain the most accurate information possible, working with both the City of Toronto and UrbanNation to compile the list of official nominees, vetted against the selection criteria. Once the list has been finalized both the Architect of Record and Developers of each project are notified and provided with submission guidelines on how to supply images and supporting text. In the instance that no information is submitted, or submitted images do not follow the provided submission guidelines, the Pug Awards assigns a professional photographer to photograph the project.

If you believe any nominee information to be inaccurate please notify us at: [email protected].